You Heard It Here First

AO Scott, 27 June, 2012: “It’s telling that Hollywood placed a big bet on superheroes at a time when two of its traditional heroic genres — the western and the war movie — were in eclipse, partly because they seemed ideologically out of kilter with the times.”

Jentleman Film Journal, 5 May, 2012: “For all those differences, I contend that the superhero movie (let’s refer to this subgenre as the ‘Super’ for linguistic ease) should be viewed as the truest modern descendant of the Western. However different they are, they are unified by the theme of heroism, which powers everything that happens within them.”

Points to him for saying it better, though.

The Week in Review: “The Avengers”

The big movie story of last week, as fans of The Avengers (apparently every person on the planet, based on how hard it was to get a ticket for 11am on a Sunday) will already know, was Samuel L Jackson’s vitriolic response to AO Scott’s ambivalent review of the movie. It’s not surprising that Scott’s review wasn’t glowing – he’s as good as openly admitted to having little tolerance for Supers – but Jackson’s response seemed out of proportion, and, perhaps, in its mild air of entitlement, a depressing exclamation point on the seeming irrelevance with these movies, not of critics and criticism, exactly, so much as the very idea of ‘good’ or ‘bad.’

Read More

The Heroes Walk Among Us: Avengers, Dark Knights, and the Superhero Movie as Modern Western

Back in 2000, 20th Century Fox took a gamble on the idea that taking Marvel’s campy superhero properties and cinematizing them with high production value and top talent would pay off at the box office. They hired a hot young director, to whom they gave significant creative control, and recruited two highly-acclaimed veteran actors to headline the cast. The result was X-Men, which was critically well-received, which, with a gross of just under $300 million, was one of the top ten earners of the year, and which set off the ongoing trend of giving every possible superhero franchise the screen treatment.

With today’s release of The Avengers and the upcoming July premiere of The Dark Knight Rises – not to mention the surely-misguided reboot of the Spider-Man franchise and February’s superhero-subversive Chronicle – 2012 may well prove to be the pinnacle of that trend. Both movies should finish among the year’s top movies, and if Rises is anywhere near as good as prequel The Dark Knight, it’ll probably have the inside track to the genre’s first Best Picture nomination. While there’s no such thing as a sure bet in this industry, the modern superhero movie may be the closest thing to it; even Bryan Singer’s mediocre Superman Returns made almost $400 million.

Read More

The Week In Review: “Chronicle”

Remember those scenes early in the first Spiderman movie, where Peter Parker discovers that he all of a sudden has these super powers and starts playing around to see what he can do? In spirit, if not in direct patrilineage, those scenes are the progenitors of Chronicle, about three high school seniors who gain telekinetic powers. As in the Marvel film, there is a clear progression of inquiry, from incident to experimentation to the broader question of what to do with these powers. Chronicle, though, is a more circumscribed, personal movie, if any movie about superpowers can be described as ‘personal.’

The most central of the three protagonists, Andrew (Dane DeHaan), is one of those socially inept high schoolers who has sort of slipped through the cracks. He’s a bit of an introvert, and we get the sense that he doesn’t have anything that he’s really good at; meanwhile, he lives with a dying mother and an abusive, embittered father. At the beginning of the movie, he begins filming everything that he does, and the narrative progresses in the found footage style that has been in vogue recently (Paranormal Activity, Cloverfield, etc). By chance, he, his cousin Matt, and local popular kid Steve stumble on an unidentified, presumably alien, object, which they soon discover has given them the power to move objects with their minds.

The found footage gimmick is a little cumbersome, especially at the beginning of the movie, but you get used to it after a while – and Chronicle, by virtue of its telekinetic heroes, finds a way to cheat itself into a bit more leeway once the characters have begun playing with their new abilities. Though it raises some questions, the found footage technique also provides the film’s most sophisticated touches, as in one scene later in the film where Andrew, lying on his bed, gazes inscrutably, as if trying to look at himself, up at us as we float above him.

The movie’s biggest problem – as well, perhaps, as its most interesting element – is the disjointedness between the two halves. Most of the first part of Chronicle is about these kids reveling in the joy of their new abilities, and here, at least, the found-footage approach is frequently effective: you really feel like you’re seeing their delight  as something captured rather than something staged. At some point, though, the movie veers off on a darker tangent, and it doesn’t quite all fit together. The plot points are all in place, but the characters haven’t quite been put together well enough to make what happens make sense. (I realize that that’s pretty ambiguous, but I can’t add much more without betraying what happens.) And, speaking more broadly, it’s frustrating to see writers and directors continue to bank on the imagined cultural memory of what high school is like.

All that said, I liked Chronicle quite a bit. Like last year’s Kick-Ass, it has at its core the idea of deconstructing the superhero myth, but it does so a lot more successfully because, unlike Kick-Ass, it doesn’t end up relying on that same myth for its dramatic payoff. Andrew, Matt, and Steve are just a bunch of kids – and, in what might be the movie’s greatest innovation, they don’t stop being kids just because they figure out how to fly.

Watchmen, 2009

Director Zack Snyder’s first appearance in our series. Don’t worry- it won’t be his last.

On a side note, this is our second superhero / comic book trailer in as many weeks, and looking at my list for the next couple there’s several more. That suggests to me that the sort of visuals that are often found in comic book adaptations are more well-suited to appealing to the kinds of images that excite us in trailers than are, say, dramas. More on this to come?

On another side note, a connection to last week’s trailer is that Watchmen director Snyder has been hired to direct the first film in the rebooted Superman franchise. Does that mean that we’re headed toward the greatest divide between good trailer / bad movie ever?